Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance
IMAGE: Cover showing the title “Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance” above a blue map-like silhouette of Orkney and surrounding areas.
Contents
- Purpose of this guidance
- Policy context
- How to use this guidance
- Online interactive maps
- Receptor updates
- Identified Receptors
- Significance and sensitivity of receptors
- Spatial guidance
- Appendix 1: Special Protection Areas and qualifying features sensitivity assessment
- Appendix 2: Special Areas of Conservation assessment
- Appendix 3: Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas assessment
- Appendix 4: Priority Marine Features assessment
- Appendix 5: Receptor location data updates
Acronyms
| Term | Acronym |
|---|---|
| Automatic Identification System | AIS |
| Biodiversity Action Plan | BAP |
| Clyde Cruising Club | CCC |
| European Union | EU |
| Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool | FeAST |
| Geodatabase of Marine Features Adjacent to Scotland | GeMS |
| Historic Marine Protected Area | HMPA |
| invasive non-indigenous species | INIS |
| Marine Protected Area | MPA |
| Nature Conservation Marine Protected Area | NC MPA |
| Nationally Important Marine Feature | NIMF |
| National Scenic Area | NSA |
| Priority Marine Feature | PMF |
| Special Area of Conservation | SAC |
| Special Protection Area | SPA |
| Ship-to-ship | STS |
1. Purpose of this guidance
1.1
The Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance is a decision support tool that should inform decision making by public authorities and developers on finfish farm development proposals in the Orkney Islands marine region.
1.2
The purpose of this Spatial Guidance is to:
- support the implementation of the Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan Sector Policy 2b: Finfish and shellfish farming;
- identify areas of greater and lesser potential sensitivity and/or constraint for finfish farming development in the Orkney Islands marine region;
- provide greater clarity for stakeholders on the significance, and potential sensitivity of identified environmental, historic, social, economic and infrastructure features, or receptors, to finfish farming development; and
- inform stakeholder understanding and participation in the planning and decision-making process for finfish farming development.
2. Policy context
2.1
Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance is non-statutory planning guidance that supports the implementation of the Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan Sector Policy 2b: Finfish and shellfish farming (see below). Sector Policy 2b vi. states that proposals for finfish farming development should have regard to this spatial guidance.
Sector Policy 2: Aquaculture
Sector Policy 2a: Safeguarding the operation of active aquaculture sites
Proposals for development and/or activities should avoid, minimise and/or appropriately mitigate significant adverse impacts on the operation of active aquaculture sites.
Sector Policy 2b: Finfish and shellfish farming
i. Proposals for finfish and shellfish farming development and/or activities should have regard to:
- the Orkney Local Development Plan;
- the National Marine Plan;
- the National Planning Framework; and
- any Marine Directorate or SEPA licensing requirements and guidance.
ii. Proposals for finfish and shellfish farming development and/or activities should avoid, minimise and/or appropriately mitigate significant adverse impacts on:
- landscape and/or seascape character and visual amenity;
- nature conservation designations, protected species, and the wider biodiversity, including the national status of Priority Marine Features;
- seal haul-out sites;
- wild salmonid fish populations due to sea lice and/or escapes (applies to finfish farming only);
- water quality, biological carrying capacity and the benthic environment;
- historic environment assets;
- other coastal and marine users including, but not limited to, commercial fishing, shipping and navigation, port and harbour infrastructure/operations, active aquaculture sites, marine cable routes and pipelines, tourism, recreation, and sport and leisure activities; and
- amenity, including consideration of road traffic, noise, light, access, vibration, odour and litter impacts.
iii. Proposals for finfish and shellfish development and/or activities should ensure appropriate measures are included to prevent the introduction and spread of non-native species.
iv. New finfish farms should not bridge Disease Management Areas, although boundaries may be revised by the Marine Directorate to take account of any changes in fish farm location, subject to the continued management of risk.
v. Appropriate planning conditions and, where necessary, a financial bond or a letter of credit will be concluded to ensure that decommissioning and site restoration arrangements will be implemented following cessation of the operation.
vi. Proposals for finfish farming development should have regard to the Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance.
vii. Proposals for shellfish farming development should have regard to the Orkney Islands Marine Region: Shellfish Farming Spatial Guidance, where available.
3. How to use this guidance
3.1
This guidance should be used to guide decision making on finfish farming development in the Orkney Islands marine region. It does not identify locations that are suitable or unsuitable for finfish farm development. The Spatial Guidance is a decision support tool to help identify areas of greater and lesser sensitivity and/or constraint to finfish farming development.
3.2
There are environmental, historic, social, economic and infrastructure features, or receptors, in the Orkney Islands marine region and adjacent coastal areas, that can be affected by finfish farming development and/or activities. This Spatial Guidance identifies the location, significance and potential sensitivity of these receptors to finfish farm development.
3.3
The Spatial Guidance receptors have been selected in accordance with the criteria in the Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan, Sector Policy 2b ii. Table 1 identifies the relevant receptors along with their spatial extent and the Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan policies that are relevant to each receptor. These receptors include, for example, designated nature conservation sites and electricity cables.
3.4
Receptors have varying levels of significance. For example, internationally rare or vulnerable habitats or species have greater significance than habitats or species that are more common and/or of lesser conservation importance.
Receptors can also have higher or lower levels of sensitivity to finfish farming development and/or activities. For example, the various Priority Marine Features have different levels of sensitivity to organic enrichment associated with finfish farming development and/or activities. Where relevant, a receptor’s significance value is assigned on the basis of its position within the hierarchy of international, national and regional/local importance.
3.5
Table 2 provides information on the significance, and potential sensitivity of the identified environmental, historic, social, economic and infrastructure receptors to finfish farm development. The receptors have been assigned values according to their significance and their potential sensitivity, as identified in Table 2. The location, and significance and sensitivity values, of the receptors are identified in the guidance maps in Section 7: Spatial Guidance.
3.6
Further information on the identified nature conservation receptors, and their potential sensitivity to finfish farm development and/or activities, is provided in Appendices 1 to 4.
3.7
The significance of any potential impact or effect associated with a specific finfish farming development or activity proposal is influenced by factors including, but not limited to, location, scale, siting and design, and any appropriate development specific mitigation measures. These development specific impacts or effects, and associated mitigation measures, are assessed as part of the relevant statutory consenting processes. For the purposes of this guidance, the assessments have been undertaken prior to the consideration of any development or site-specific mitigation.
4. Online interactive maps
4.1
A web-based interactive spatial tool can be accessed at Orkney Islands Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance. This service allows users to identify nearby receptors from a given point by clicking on a desired location. The search distance from the clicked location can be set by the user, for example, all receptors within 1 km, with the option to view further information on the receptors present within the search area.
5. Receptor updates
5.1
It is important that the location, significance and sensitivity of the receptors is identified using the most up to date data. The receptor locations identified in Appendix 5, Table A6, may be periodically reviewed and updated using the identified data sources. Relevant receptors may also be periodically updated to reflect updates to the Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool (FeAST). These updates may be made to this Spatial Guidance without the need for further public consultation on an updated spatial guidance document.
6. Identified Receptors
6.1
Table 1 identifies the receptors that are of relevance to Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan Sector Policy 2b ii., along with their identified spatial extent and the Orkney Islands Regional Marine Plan general policies of relevance to each receptor.
Table 1. Identified receptors summary
| Receptor | Relevant criteria from Sector Policy 2b ii. Finfish and shellfish farming | Other relevant general policies and sector policies | Spatial extent of receptor in spatial guidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Special Protection Areas (SPA) | b) Nature conservation designations | General Policy 9: Nature | Site boundary. The foraging range of SPA qualifying bird features are identified in Appendix 1, Table A2. |
| Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) | b) Nature conservation designations | General Policy 9: Nature | Site boundary. |
| Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (NC MPA) | b) Nature conservation designations | General Policy 9: Nature | Site boundary. |
| Priority Marine Features (PMF): Maerl beds, seagrass beds, flame shell beds, horse mussel beds and fan shell aggregations | b) Priority Marine Features | General Policy 9: Nature | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Principal Sea Trout Spawning Burns | b) Priority Marine Features; d) Wild salmonid fish populations | General Policy 9: Nature | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Seal haul-out sites | c) Seal haul-out sites | General Policy 9: Nature | Haul-out site boundary including 500 metre disturbance buffer from the shore and rocks where seals haul-out. |
| National Scenic Area (NSA) | a) Landscape and/or seascape character and visual amenity | General Policy 10: Seascape and landscape | Site boundary. |
| World Heritage Site and Inner Sensitivity Zone | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Site boundary and Inner Sensitive Zone boundary. The wider setting of the World Heritage Site component sites has not been spatially identified in the guidance maps. |
| Scapa Flow Historic Marine Protected Area (HMPA) | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Site boundary. |
| Scheduled Monuments | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Site boundary. The setting of scheduled monuments has not been spatially identified in the guidance maps. |
| Listed buildings | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². The setting of listed buildings has not been spatially identified in the guidance maps. |
| Controlled Sites or Protected Places | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Conservation Areas | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Site boundary. The setting of conservation areas has not been spatially identified in the guidance maps. |
| Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes | f) Historic environment assets | General Policy 8: Historic environment | Site boundary. The setting of historic gardens and designated landscapes has not been spatially identified in the guidance maps. |
| National Development – Scapa Deep Water Quay / sensitive area | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | 1500 m radius sensitive area from centre point of proposed quay edge. |
| National Development – Orkney Logistics Base, Hatston / sensitive area | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | 1500 m radius sensitive area from centre point of proposed quay edge. |
| Scapa Flow North and East Safeguarded Area | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | Area boundary, 1500 metres from Mean High Water Springs. |
| Indicative ferry routes | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | Indicative ferry routes with 250 metre minimum buffer either side. Impacts or effects on safety of navigation can occur outwith these identified indicative areas. |
| Shipping Density Areas | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | Average weekly shipping density at a 2 km grid resolution. |
| Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | Area boundary. |
| Indicative Shipping Routes (Scapa Flow Harbour Area) | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | Indicative shipping routes with 250 metre minimum buffer either side. |
| Indicative pier and harbour infrastructure sensitive area | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | 1500 m radius sensitive area from end of pier. These areas are indicative. The exact extent of the operational area around pier and harbour infrastructure varies depending on the specific maritime operations, for example pier use, vessel size and type. Impacts on safety of navigation and harbour operations can occur outwith the identified indicative areas. |
| Designated anchor berths and designated ship-to-ship (STS) anchor berths (Scapa Flow), as identified on UK Hydrographic Office Charts | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries | 1500 m radius sensitive area from anchor berth point. These areas are indicative. The exact extent of the operational area around anchor berths varies depending on the specific maritime operations. Impacts or effects on anchor berth operations can occur outwith the identified indicative areas. |
| Flotta Terminal Safeguarded Area | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries; Sector Policy 6: Zero carbon fuels, oil and gas transition | Area boundary. |
| Anchorages listed in the Clyde Cruising Club (CCC) sailing directions and anchorages publication | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries; Sector Policy 7: Tourism, recreation, leisure and sport | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Visiting Yacht Moorings | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries; Sector Policy 7: Tourism, recreation, leisure and sport | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Other anchorages | g) Shipping and navigation, ports and harbour infrastructure/operations | Sector Policy 3: Shipping, ports, harbours and ferries; Sector Policy 7: Tourism, recreation, leisure and sport | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
| Submarine electricity cables | g) Marine cable routes | Sector Policy 4: Pipeline, electricity and telecommunications infrastructure | Cable with 250 metre buffer either side. |
| Submarine telecommunication cables | g) Marine cable routes | Sector Policy 4: Pipeline, electricity and telecommunications infrastructure | Cable with 250 metre buffer either side. |
| Out of Service (OoS) subsea cables | g) Marine cable routes | Sector Policy 4: Pipeline, electricity and telecommunications infrastructure | Cable with 250 metre buffer either side. |
| Hydrocarbon pipelines | g) Pipelines | Sector Policy 4: Pipeline, electricity and telecommunications infrastructure | Pipeline with 500 metre buffer either side. |
| Subsea water pipelines | g) Pipelines | Sector Policy 4: Pipeline, electricity and telecommunications infrastructure | Pipeline with 250 metre buffer either side. |
| Wave and tidal energy sites – Crown Estate Scotland lease and agreement for lease areas | g) Other coastal and marine users | Sector Policy 5: Offshore wind, wave and tidal renewable energy generation | Lease or Agreement for Lease areas. |
| The Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy – Plan Options (2020) | g) Other coastal and marine users | Sector Policy 5: Offshore wind, wave and tidal renewable energy generation | Plan Option areas. |
| Active aquaculture sites | g) Active aquaculture sites | N/A | Point data, minimum raster grid of approximately 300 m². |
There are PMF locations within Orkney’s waters that have not yet been recorded and are therefore not identified in the spatial data used within this guidance. PMF records will be periodically updated within this guidance as detailed in Appendix 5 to incorporate any updated records.
6.2
The assessment of relevant finfish farm consent applications will take into account, through the relevant process, any impacts or effects on receptors located outwith the Orkney Islands marine region. For example, any likely significant effects on Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation.
6.3
Non-designated historic environment assets are not identified in this Spatial Guidance. For information on non-designated historic environment assets in the Orkney Islands marine region refer to Trove.scot.
7. Significance and sensitivity of receptors
7.1
Table 2 provides information on the significance, and potential sensitivity of the identified environmental, historic, social, economic and infrastructure receptors to finfish farm development and/or activities.
Table 2: Significance and sensitivity of receptors
Significance and sensitivity values are assessed on a scale of 1 to 3, where 1 is low, 2 is medium and 3 is high.
| Receptor | Significance value | Receptor significance | Sensitivity value | Receptor sensitivity to finfish farming development and/or activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Special Protection Areas (SPA) | 3 | Special Protection Areas (SPAs) are selected to protect one or more rare, threatened or vulnerable bird species listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive, or certain regularly occurring migratory species. SPAs are of international conservation significance. | 2–3 | An individual site sensitivity value has been assigned to relevant SPAs within Orkney and the Orkney Islands marine region. The sensitivity value for each SPA has been assigned on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s qualifying bird features to pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities. Refer to Appendix 1. The Orkney SPAs with qualifying features that have no identified pressure/interaction with finfish farming development and/or activities have been screened out and are therefore not included in the significance and sensitivity maps in this Spatial Guidance. SPAs outwith Orkney and the Orkney Islands marine region have potential connectivity with proposed finfish farming development and/or activities in Orkney. These SPAs are not identified in this Spatial Guidance. |
| Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) | 3 | SACs are of international conservation significance. SACs in Scotland are designated by Scottish Ministers under the European Union (EU) Habitats Directive. They are areas which have been identified as best representing the range and variety within the EU of habitats and (non-bird) species listed on Annex I and II to the Directive. SACs in terrestrial areas and marine areas out to 12 nautical miles are afforded protection through the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994, as amended. | 3 | An individual site sensitivity value has been assigned to relevant SACs within Orkney and the Orkney Islands marine region. The sensitivity value for each SAC has been assigned on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s qualifying features to pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities. Refer to Appendix 2. |
| Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (NC MPA) | 2 | Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (NC MPAs) protect a wide range of habitats, species, geology and undersea landforms in Scottish waters. NC MPAs are statutory designations under the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 and are of national significance. | 3 | An individual site sensitivity value has been assigned to each NC MPA within the Orkney Islands marine region. The sensitivity value for each NC MPA has been assigned on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s protected features to pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities. Refer to Appendix 3. |
| PMF: Maerl beds, seagrass beds, flame shell beds, horse mussel beds and fan shell aggregations | 2–3 | PMFs are species and habitats which have been identified as being of conservation importance in Scotland. PMFs are a subset of species and habitats identified on national, UK or international lists. Therefore, all PMFs are of at least national conservation significance in Scotland, but may be of UK level or international significance. Each PMF recorded in the Orkney Islands marine region has been attributed a significance value on the basis of national or international conservation status. Refer to Appendix 4. | 3 | The sensitivity of PMFs to pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities has been assigned using the Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool (FeAST) and advice provided by NatureScot. |
| Principal Sea Trout Spawning Burns | 2 | Sea trout is listed as a Priority Species in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and the Scottish Biodiversity List. The marine phase of the sea trout’s life cycle is also included on the list of PMFs. The species is of national significance. | 3 | The sensitivity of sea trout has been informed by research and analysis published by Scottish Government on the interaction of salmon farming with wild sea trout populations and potential impacts from sea lice. |
| Seal haul-out sites | 2 | Seal haul-out sites are designated under section 117 of Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. They are locations on land where seals come ashore to rest, moult or breed and which have been designated by Scottish Ministers to provide additional protection for seals from intentional or reckless harassment. Seal haul-out sites were designated through the Seals (Designation of Haul-Out Sites) (Scotland) Order 2014. These sites are of national significance. | 3 | The sensitivity of grey and harbour seals has been assigned on the basis of their sensitivity to pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities. Information on seal sensitivity can be found within Sanday and Faray SAC qualifying features in Appendix 2. |
| NSA | 2 | The Hoy and West Mainland NSA is nationally important for its scenic quality. NSAs are designated under Part 10 of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 giving NSAs a statutory basis. NSAs are of national significance. | 3 | Finfish farming development and/or activities can have significant effects on the special qualities of the Hoy and West Mainland NSA. Particular special qualities of the NSA are highly sensitive to finfish farm development and/or activities. |
| World Heritage Site and Inner Sensitivity Zone | 3 | The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site comprises six individual component sites: the settlement of Skara Brae, Maeshowe, the Stones of Stenness, the Watch Stone, the Barnhouse Stone and the Ring of Brodgar and its associated ritual and funerary monuments. The World Heritage Site was formally inscribed onto the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1999 as a group of sites deemed to be an outstanding testimony to the cultural achievements of the Neolithic peoples of Northern Europe, fulfilling four of the six criteria of Outstanding Universal Value for cultural sites. The World Heritage Site and Inner Sensitive Zone are of international significance. | 3 | The World Heritage Site component sites are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities. The Inner Sensitivity Zone identifies an area of high sensitivity to development and/or activities that could affect the wider landscape setting of the World Heritage Site component sites. |
| Scapa Flow Historic Marine Protected Area (HMPA) | 2 | HMPAs are designated under Section 67 of the Marine Scotland Act 2010 to protect marine historic assets of national importance within Scottish territorial waters. | 3 | The marine historic features of the HMPA are highly sensitive to direct impacts from development and/or activities including abrasion and collision, for example from anchors and moorings, and changes to physical processes and/or sedimentation. |
| Scheduled Monuments | 2 | Designated under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, scheduled monuments are archaeological sites, buildings or structures of national historic importance. These monuments include the wrecks of the German High Sea Fleet in Scapa Flow, numerous brochs, burnt mounds, World War 1 and World War 2 coastal defences, castles and Neolithic, Iron Age to medieval settlements. | 3 | The German High Sea Fleet scheduled monuments are highly sensitive to direct impacts from development and/or activities including abrasion and collision, for example from anchors and moorings, and changes to physical processes and/or sedimentation. Coastal scheduled monuments are highly sensitive to impacts from development and/or activities on their setting. |
| Listed buildings | 1–2 | There are many coastal and marine related listed buildings in Orkney including lighthouses, harbour infrastructure, such as the Lyness Golden Wharf and Kirkwall Harbour, North Ronaldsay Sheep Dyke and clusters of numerous listed buildings within coastal settlements. Listed under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997, listed buildings are buildings of special architectural or historic interest and are listed by Historic Environment Scotland. Category A and B listed buildings are assigned a significance value of 2 and C listed buildings a significance value of 1 within this Spatial Guidance. | 3 | Listed buildings are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities. Listed buildings are highly sensitive to impacts from development and/or activities on their setting. |
| Controlled Sites or Protected Places | 3 | HMS Hampshire, HMS Royal Oak, HMS Pheasant, and HMS Vanguard are designated controlled sites under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. These are often referred to as war graves. Permission is required from the Ministry of Defence to access these sites. | 3 | Controlled Sites or Protected Places are highly sensitive to direct impacts from development and/or activities including abrasion and collision, for example from anchors and moorings, and changes to physical processes and/or sedimentation. |
| Conservation Areas | 2 | The coastal settlements of Kirkwall, Stromness, St Margaret’s Hope and Balfour Village are designated Conservation Areas. Eynhallow and Brodgar are also Conservation Areas. Conservation Areas are areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. Conservation Areas are designated under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997. | 3 | Conservation Areas are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities that affect their special architectural or historic interest, or the area’s character or appearance. Conservation Areas are highly sensitive to impacts from development and/or activities on their setting. |
| Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes | 2 | Balfour Castle, Skaill House and Melsetter House are designated Gardens and Designed Landscapes. All landscapes included in the Inventory of Designed Landscapes are considered to be of national importance. Sites in the Inventory of Gardens and Designed Landscapes are selected under the terms of Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. | 3 | Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities. Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes are highly sensitive to impacts from development and/or activities on their setting. |
| National Development – Scapa Deep Water Quay | 2 | Scapa Deep Water Quay is identified as a national development in National Planning Framework 4. | 3 | Scapa Deep Water Quay and the associated marine area, 1500 m radius, is highly sensitive to finfish farming development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| National Development – Orkney Logistics Base, Hatston | 2 | Orkney Logistics Base, Hatston, is identified as a national development in National Planning Framework 4. | 3 | Orkney Logistics Base, Hatston, and the associated marine area, 1500 m radius, is highly sensitive to finfish farming development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Scapa Flow North and East Safeguarded Area | 2 | The north and east coast of Scapa Flow, from Stromness to St Mary’s, within an area 1,500 m from the shore, is a strategically important area for potential future harbour development and/or activities in the longer term. Scapa Flow is a nationally significant harbour asset identified in National Planning Framework 4. | 2 | The north and east coast of Scapa Flow is potentially sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Indicative ferry routes | 3 | Ferry routes are highly significant due their community, transportation and economic importance. | 3 | Ferry routes are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and their efficient operation/use. |
| Shipping density areas | 3 | Areas with a medium/high shipping density are highly significant for the safe navigation of vessels. This can be for both local and international operations. | 1–3 | The sensitivity of a given area ranges from low to high depending on the frequency of use, or shipping density. This is calculated from the average weekly density of vessels passing through each raster grid cell, taken from Automatic Identification System (AIS) data. Shipping density associated with vessels that do not carry AIS are not represented in this Spatial Guidance. |
| Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge | 3 | The Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge is highly significant for the safety of oil tankers in distress when navigating the southern approach to Scapa Flow. | 3 | The Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge is highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect the utilisation of this refuge site for maritime safety purposes. |
| Indicative Shipping Routes (Scapa Flow Harbour Area) | 3 | These important shipping routes within Scapa Flow have been identified in consultation with the Orkney Harbour Authority. These shipping routes are of high significance for the safe and efficient operation of the Scapa Flow Harbour Area. | 3 | The indicative shipping routes (Scapa Flow Harbour Area) are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Indicative pier and harbour infrastructure sensitive areas | 3 | Pier and harbour infrastructure assets include the 29 piers operated by the Orkney Harbour Authority, St Margaret’s Hope Pier and the Geo Amenity Slipway, Deerness. These pier and harbour infrastructure assets are of high economic, transport and/or community importance. | 3 | Pier and harbour infrastructure, and the associated sensitive areas, 1500 m radius, is highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Designated anchor berths and designated STS anchor berths (Scapa Flow) | 3 | Scapa Flow is identified in National Planning Framework 4 as a nationally significant harbour asset. Scapa Flow is one of the principal locations in Europe for ship-to-ship (STS) operations for the transfer of crude and fuel oils. There are 15 designated anchor berths in Scapa Flow including 4 STS berths. Designated anchor berths include the associated 1500 metre radius sensitive areas for safe vessel manoeuvring. Designated Anchor Berths (Scapa Flow) are of high significance due to their navigational safety, pollution control and economic functions. | 3 | Designated Anchor Berths (Scapa Flow) and the associated marine area, 1500 m radius, are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect anchoring, safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Flotta Terminal Safeguarded Area | 3 | The Flotta Safeguarded Area is the maritime operational area located to the north of Flotta Terminal. The Flotta Terminal Safeguarded Area is of high significance due to its navigational safety, pollution control and economic functions. | 3 | The Flotta Safeguarded Area is highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect safety of navigation and harbour operations. |
| Anchorages listed in the CCC sailing directions and anchorages publication | 2 | CCC anchorages are important assets supporting safe navigation, the marine economy and recreational activities. | 3 | CCC anchorages are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect mooring/anchoring and safety of navigation. |
| Visiting Yacht Moorings (VYMs) | 2 | VYMs are important assets supporting safe navigation, the marine economy and recreational activities. | 3 | VYMs are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect mooring/anchoring and safety of navigation. |
| Other established anchorages | 2 | Other established anchorages are important assets supporting safe navigation, the marine economy and recreational activities. | 3 | Other established anchorages are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect mooring/anchoring and safety of navigation. |
| Submarine electricity cables | 3 | Electricity cables provide critical infrastructure of high significance connecting Orkney to mainland Scotland, and for distribution of electricity to Orkney communities. | 3 | Electricity cables are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities, for example anchors. |
| Submarine telecommunication cables | 3 | Telecommunication cables provide critical infrastructure of high significance for communications for Orkney communities, Scotland and outwards to international locations via an extensive network. | 3 | Telecommunication cables are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from finfish farming development and/or activities, for example anchors. |
| Out of Service (OoS) subsea cables | 1 | Out of Service (OoS) subsea cables are occasionally left on the seabed, either to guide new cable installations or due to being abandoned from dissolved companies. They do not perform a utilities or communications function. | 1 | Out of Service (OoS) subsea cables are of low sensitivity to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities. They are an obstruction and/or entanglement risk for finfish farm development and/or activities. |
| Hydrocarbon pipelines | 3 | Crude oil is imported to the Flotta Oil Terminal via a 30-inch subsea pipeline from several offshore installations in the Flotta Catchment Area. This subsea pipeline is protected by a 500 m safety zone established by an Offshore Installations (Safety Zones) Order under Section 22 of the Petroleum Act 1987. This pipeline is of high significance due to its safety, pollution control and economic functions. | 3 | Hydrocarbon pipelines are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities, for example anchors. |
| Subsea water pipelines | 3 | Subsea water pipelines provide critical potable and wastewater infrastructure for Orkney communities of high significance. | 3 | Water pipelines are highly sensitive to direct physical impacts from development and/or activities, for example anchors. |
| Wave and tidal energy sites – Crown Estate Scotland lease and agreement for lease areas | 3 | Wave and tidal lease sites within the Orkney Islands marine region are operated by the European Marine Energy Centre. These sites are of high significance for international research and development in renewable energy innovation and contribute significant economic benefits. | 3 | Wave and tidal energy testing sites are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect their construction, operation or decommissioning. |
| The Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy – Plan Options (2020) | 3 | The Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy sets out the strategic vision and objectives for future commercial-scale offshore wind development in Scotland. It has identified two Plan Option areas, North 1 (N1) and North East 2 (NE2), within the Orkney Islands marine region, along with a wider suite of Plan Option areas across the Scottish marine area. The agreements for lease within these Plan Options areas have been issued via the Scotwind leasing round. National Marine Plan 2015 identifies that the Plan Options areas are the preferred strategic locations for the sustainable development of offshore wind and that this preference should be taken into account by marine planners and decision makers if alternative development or use of these areas is being considered. The Plan Option areas are of high strategic importance in terms of just transition, climate crises and socio-economic benefit priorities within National Planning Framework 4. | 3 | Plan Option areas are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect their construction, operation or decommissioning. |
| Active aquaculture sites | 3 | Existing active aquaculture sites make a significant contribution to the economy and require significant investment from site operators. The purpose of identifying existing active aquaculture sites in this Spatial Guidance is to help safeguard these assets from potential adverse effects from new fish farm development. | 3 | Active aquaculture sites are highly sensitive to development and/or activities that could affect their safe and efficient operation. |
8. Spatial guidance
8.1
This Spatial Guidance provides information on the location, significance, and potential sensitivity of the identified environmental, historic, social, economic and infrastructure receptors to finfish farm development (see Table 1 and Table 2).
8.2
The Spatial Guidance is provided in a suite of maps:
Nature conservation
- Map 1: Nature conservation site receptors
- Map 2: Priority Marine Feature receptors
- Map 3: Nature receptors significance and sensitivity
Landscape and seascape
- Map 4: Landscape and seascape receptors
- Map 5: Landscape and seascape receptors significance and sensitivity
Historic environment
- Map 6: Historic environment asset receptors
- Map 7: Historic environment receptors significance and sensitivity
Socio-economic / infrastructure
- Map 8: Harbour infrastructure and operations receptors
- Map 9: Energy, utilities and aquaculture infrastructure receptors
- Map 10: Shipping density and ferry routes
- Map 11: All socio-economic/infrastructure and operations receptor significance and sensitivity
All receptors
- Map 12: All receptors significance and sensitivity, that is, data from Maps 3, 5, 7 and 11.
8.3
Maps 3, 5, 7, 11 and 12 identify areas of the Orkney Islands marine region with higher and lower levels of receptor significance and sensitivity to finfish farming development. Information on the significance, and sensitivity of the identified receptors to finfish farm development and/or activities is presented in Table 2. The receptors have been assigned values according to their significance and their potential sensitivity, as identified in Table 2. The Spatial Guidance Maps 3, 5, 7, 11 and 12 present the cumulative significance and sensitivity values for the identified receptors, that is, the sum of overlaying receptor values.
8.4
Interactive maps can be accessed at Orkney Marine Region: Finfish Farming Spatial Guidance to allow users to look at locations in greater detail.
8.5
Information on the identified nature receptors, and their potential sensitivity to finfish farm development and/or activities, is provided in Appendices 1 to 4.
Nature Conservation Receptor Spatial Guidance
Map 1: Nature conservation site receptors
IMAGE: Map of the Orkney Islands marine region showing Special Protection Areas, Special Areas of Conservation, Marine Protected Areas, Ramsar sites and seal haul-out sites with a 500 metre buffer. The map key identifies the Orkney Islands marine region boundary and the various designated areas.
Nature conservation sites that have no identified pressure interactions with finfish farming development and/or activities have been screened out of the significance and sensitivity analysis and mapping in this spatial guidance. See Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for more information.
Map 2: Priority Marine Feature receptors
IMAGE: Map of the Orkney Islands marine region showing recorded Priority Marine Feature locations. The key identifies fan mussel, flame shell beds, horse mussel beds, maerl beds, northern feather star, ocean quahog, seagrass beds and principal sea trout spawning burns.
The Geodatabase of Marine Features Adjacent to Scotland (GeMS) Priority Marine Feature records in the Orkney Islands marine region are identified in Map 2. There are PMF locations that have not yet been recorded and are therefore not identified in the spatial data used within this Guidance.
Map 3: Nature conservation receptor significance and sensitivity
IMAGE: Map showing cumulative nature conservation receptor significance and sensitivity across the Orkney Islands marine region. The key ranges from lower cumulative significance/sensitivity to higher cumulative significance/sensitivity.
Map 3 presents the cumulative significance and sensitivity values for the identified nature receptors, that is, the sum of overlaying receptor values.
Landscape and Seascape Receptor Spatial Guidance
Map 4: Landscape and seascape receptors
IMAGE: Map of the Orkney Islands marine region showing the boundary of the Hoy and West Mainland National Scenic Area. The map key identifies the National Scenic Area and the Orkney Islands marine region.
Map 5: Landscape and seascape receptor significance and sensitivity
IMAGE: Map showing the cumulative significance and sensitivity of the landscape receptor, with the Hoy and West Mainland National Scenic Area highlighted. The key ranges from lower cumulative significance/sensitivity to higher cumulative significance/sensitivity.
Map 5 presents the significance and sensitivity value for the identified landscape receptor, that is, the Hoy and West Mainland National Scenic Area.
Historic Environment Receptor Spatial Guidance
Map 6: Historic environment asset receptors
IMAGE: Map of the Orkney Islands marine region showing controlled sites, protected places, listed buildings, conservation areas, gardens and designed landscapes, scheduled monuments, the Historic Marine Protected Area, the World Heritage Site boundary and the World Heritage Site Inner Sensitivity Zone.
Coastal historic environment assets have been identified in Map 6 to inform the assessment of impacts on their setting.
Map 7: Historic environment asset receptor significance and sensitivity
IMAGE: Map showing the cumulative significance and sensitivity of historic environment receptors across the Orkney Islands marine region. The key ranges from lower cumulative significance/sensitivity to higher cumulative significance/sensitivity.
Map 7 presents the cumulative significance and sensitivity values for the identified receptors, that is, the sum of overlaying receptor values.
Socio-Economic, Infrastructure and Operations Receptor Spatial Guidance
Map 8: Harbour infrastructure and operations receptors
IMAGE: Map of the Orkney Islands marine region showing designated STS anchor berths, designated anchor berths, CCC anchorages, other anchorages, visiting yacht moorings, Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge, the Scapa Flow North and East Safeguarded Area, designated anchor berth sensitive areas, designated STS anchor berth sensitive areas, the Flotta Terminal Safeguarded Area, pier and harbour infrastructure, national development sensitive areas and the marine region boundary.
Map 9: Energy, utilities and aquaculture infrastructure receptors
IMAGE: Map showing wave and tidal energy sites, offshore wind Plan Option areas, active aquaculture sites, electricity cables, telecommunications cables, hydrocarbon pipelines, water pipelines, outfall pipelines, undefined pipelines, undefined and/or out-of-service cables, and the Orkney Islands marine region boundary.
Map 10: Shipping density and ferry routes
IMAGE: Map showing ferry routes and Scapa Flow shipping routes overlaid on shipping-density areas classified as low, medium or high. The map covers the Orkney Islands marine region and surrounding waters.
Map 10 identifies Automatic Identification System (AIS) data, Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
Map 11: Socio-economic infrastructure and operations receptor significance and sensitivity
IMAGE: Map showing cumulative socio-economic and infrastructure receptor significance and sensitivity across the Orkney Islands marine region. The key ranges from lower cumulative significance/sensitivity to higher cumulative significance/sensitivity.
Map 11 presents the cumulative significance and sensitivity values for the identified socio-economic receptors, that is, the sum of overlaying receptor score values.
All Receptors Spatial Guidance
Map 12: All receptor significance and sensitivity
IMAGE: Map showing cumulative significance and sensitivity scores for all identified receptors across the Orkney Islands marine region. The key ranges from lower cumulative significance/sensitivity to higher cumulative significance/sensitivity.
Map 12 presents the cumulative significance and sensitivity scores for all identified receptors, that is, the sum of overlaying receptor values.
Appendix 1: Special Protection Areas and qualifying features sensitivity assessment
A1.1
Special Protection Areas (SPAs) that have no identified pressure/interaction to their qualifying features with finfish farming development and/or activities have been screened out and are therefore not included in Map 3 (Nature Conservation Significance and Sensitivity).
A1.2
An individual site sensitivity value has been attributed to the relevant SPAs within Orkney and the Orkney Islands marine region that have a pathway to impact from finfish farming development and/or activities.
A1.3
The sensitivity value for each SPA has been attributed on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s qualifying bird features to finfish farming development and/or activities.
A1.4
The assessment of relevant finfish farm consent applications will take into account, through the relevant process, any impacts or effects on receptors located outwith the Orkney Islands marine region.
A1.5
The foraging ranges of the SPA qualifying features are identified in Table A2.
A1.6
The sensitivity value for each SPA has been attributed by following steps 1 to 4:
- Identify the qualifying features for each SPA (see Table A1: Column B).
- Identify the pressures/interactions from finfish farming development and/or activities for each SPA qualifying bird feature using FeAST assessments (see Table A2: Column B).
- Identify the sensitivity of the qualifying bird features to each pressure/interaction using values of low (1), medium (2) or high (3). For qualifying bird features affected by multiple pressures/interactions, the highest pressure sensitivity value was assigned to the feature (see Table A2: Column C).
- The individual SPA sensitivity value was assigned based on the most sensitive qualifying feature within the SPA citation (see Table A1: Column E).
Table A1. Special Protection Area sensitivity summary
| Special Protection Area (SPA) | Qualifying feature and condition | Pressures/interactions: finfish farming | FeAST “Feature Sensitivity” | SPA Sensitivity Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auskerry | Breeding European storm petrel (Unfavourable declining, 2018); Breeding Arctic tern (Favourable declining, 2018) | See Table A2 | Medium (2); High (3) | High (3) |
| Calf of Eday | Breeding cormorant (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding fulmar (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding great black-backed gull (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable no change, 2024); breeding guillemot (Unfavourable no change, 2024) | See Table A2 | High (3) | High (3) |
| Calf of Eday | Breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable no change, 2024) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Copinsay | Breeding fulmar (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding great black-backed gull (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding guillemot (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable declining, 2024) | See Table A2 | High (3) | High (3) |
| Copinsay | Breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable no change, 2016) | Screened out | N/A | — |
| East Sanday Coast | Non-breeding bar-tailed godwit (Favourable maintained, 2016); non-breeding turnstone (Favourable maintained, 2016); non-breeding purple sandpiper (Favourable maintained, 2016) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | N/A |
| Hoy | Breeding Arctic skua (Unfavourable declining, 2020); breeding great skua (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding great black-backed gull (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding guillemot (Unfavourable no change, 2017); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable declining, 2017); breeding red-throated diver (Favourable maintained, 2009); breeding fulmar (Unfavourable no change, 2017); breeding puffin (Unfavourable declining, 2005) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Hoy | Breeding peregrine (Favourable maintained, 2013); breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable declining, 2020) | Screened out or no pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Marwick Head | Breeding guillemot (Unfavourable no change, 2024); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable recovering, 2024) | See Table A2 | High (3) | High (3) |
| Marwick Head | Breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable declining, 2017) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Papa Westray | Breeding Arctic skua (Unfavourable declining, 2016); breeding Arctic tern (Unfavourable no change, 2017) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Papa Westray | Breeding hen harrier (Favourable maintained, 2013) | Screened out | N/A | Medium (2) |
| Orkney Mainland Moors | Non-breeding hen harrier (Favourable maintained, 2014); breeding short-eared owl (Favourable maintained, 2005) | Screened out | N/A | — |
| Orkney Mainland Moors | Breeding red-throated diver (Favourable maintained, 2009) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) | — |
| Pentland Firth Islands | Breeding Arctic tern (Unfavourable no change, 2018) | See Table A2 | High (3) | High (3) |
| Rousay | Breeding guillemot (Unfavourable no change, 2024); breeding Arctic skua (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding Arctic tern (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding fulmar (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable declining, 2016) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Rousay | Breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable declining, 2016) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Sule Skerry and Sule Stack | Breeding gannet (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding European storm petrel (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding guillemot (Favourable maintained, 2019); breeding Leach’s petrel (Unfavourable no change, 2024); breeding puffin (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding shag (Unfavourable declining, 2024) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Sule Skerry and Sule Stack | Breeding seabird assemblage (Favourable maintained, 2019) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Switha | Non-breeding Greenland barnacle goose (Favourable maintained, 2013) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | N/A |
| West Westray | Breeding guillemot (Unfavourable no change, 2024); breeding Arctic skua (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding Arctic tern (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding fulmar (Favourable maintained, 2024); breeding kittiwake (Unfavourable declining, 2024); breeding razorbill (Unfavourable declining, 2024) | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| West Westray | Breeding seabird assemblage (Unfavourable declining, 2017) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| North Orkney* | Breeding red-throated diver; non-breeding great northern diver; non-breeding Slavonian grebe; non-breeding velvet scoter | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Scapa Flow* | Breeding red-throated diver; non-breeding black-throated diver; non-breeding common eider; non-breeding European shag; non-breeding great northern diver; non-breeding long-tailed duck; non-breeding red-breasted merganser; non-breeding Slavonian grebe; breeding fulmar; breeding kittiwake | See Table A2 | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| North Caithness Cliffs | Breeding puffin (Unfavourable declining); breeding guillemot (Favourable maintained); breeding peregrine (Unfavourable declining); breeding razorbill (Favourable maintained) | See Table A2 | High (3) | — |
*As Scapa Flow SPA and North Orkney SPA are relatively recent designations (2021), the status of the qualifying features is currently unavailable.
Table A2. SPA qualifying bird features sensitivity summary*
| Species | Pressures/interactions: finfish farming | Sensitivity | Overall sensitivity | Recommended foraging range (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arctic skua (breeding) | Death or injury by collision above water; removal of non-target species (lethal) | Medium; Medium | Medium | 2.7 |
| Arctic tern (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; removal of non-target species (lethal); synthetic compound contamination, including pesticides, antifoulants and pharmaceuticals; visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; High | High | 40.5 |
| Common goldeneye (non-breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; High; High | High | Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| European shag (non-breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; High | High | 9.2±4.9 |
| Fulmar (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; High; High | High | 1200.2 |
| Gannet (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | High; Medium; Medium; High; Medium | High | 509.4 |
| Great skua (breeding) | Death or injury by collision above water; removal of non-target species (lethal) | Medium; Medium | Medium | 931.2 |
| Common guillemot (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; High; Medium; High; High | High | 153.7 |
| Kittiwake (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; removal of non-target species (lethal); synthetic compound contamination, including pesticides, antifoulants and pharmaceuticals | Medium; High; Medium | High | 300.6 |
| Leach’s petrel (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium | Medium | 657 |
| Puffin (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; High; High; Medium | High | 265.4 |
| Razorbill (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; removal of non-target species (lethal) | Medium; Medium; High; Medium; High | High | 164.6 |
| Red-throated diver (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium | Medium | 9+1** |
| European storm petrel (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium | Medium | 336 |
| Black-throated diver (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column; disturbance, vessel movement and displacement from foraging areas | High; Medium | High | Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| Common eider (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column | High | High | 3.2±4.2 |
| Cormorant (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; death or injury by collision above water; death or injury by collision below water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; High | High | 33.9 |
| Great black-backed gull (breeding) | Barrier to spp. movement, including displacement; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium; High; High | High | 73 |
| Great northern diver (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column; disturbance, vessel movement and displacement from foraging areas | High; Medium | High | North Orkney and Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| Long-tailed duck (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column | High | High | North Orkney and Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| Red-breasted merganser (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column; disturbance, vessel movement and displacement | High; Medium | High | North Orkney and Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| Slavonian grebe (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column; disturbance, vessel movement and displacement from foraging areas | High; Medium | High | North Orkney and Scapa Flow SPA boundary |
| Velvet scoter (non-breeding) | Mortality, by-catch through entanglement in nets in the water column | High | High | North Orkney SPA boundary |
| Greenland barnacle goose (non-breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Hen harrier (breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Bar-tailed godwit (non-breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Peregrine (breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Purple sandpiper (non-breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Short-eared owl (breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
| Turnstone (non-breeding) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | None | N/A |
*Recommended foraging ranges taken from NatureScot Guidance Note 3: Guidance to support offshore wind applications: marine birds – identifying theoretical.
**For red-throated divers, because of their sensitivity to aquaculture a figure of 10 km, maximum foraging range plus 1 km for swimming, is used, as advised by NatureScot.
Appendix 2: Special Areas of Conservation assessment
A2.1
SACs that have no identified pressure/interaction to their qualifying features with finfish farming development and/or activities have been screened out and are therefore not included in Map 3 (Nature Conservation Significance and Sensitivity).
A2.2
An individual site sensitivity value has been attributed to the SACs within Orkney and the Orkney Islands marine region that have a pressure/interaction to their qualifying features from finfish farming development and/or activities.
A2.3
The sensitivity value for each SAC has been attributed on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s qualifying features to finfish farming development and/or activities.
A2.4
The assessment of the relevant finfish farm consent applications will take into account, through the relevant process, any impacts or effects on receptors located outwith the Orkney Islands marine region.
A2.5
The sensitivity value for each SAC has been attributed by following steps 1 to 4:
- Identify the qualifying features for each SAC (see Table A3: Column B).
- Identify the pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities on each SAC qualifying feature in consultation with NatureScot (see Table A3: Column C).
- Identify the sensitivity of these qualifying features to each identified pressure using values of low (1), medium (2) or high (3) (see Table A3: Column D).
- Assign the individual SAC sensitivity value based on the most sensitive qualifying feature within the SAC citation (see Table A3: Column E).
Table A3: SAC Summary Table
| Special Area of Conservation | Qualifying feature and condition | Pressures/interactions: finfish farming | Sensitivity | Sensitivity value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faray and Holm of Faray | Grey seal (Unfavourable declining, 2014) | Visual disturbance (behaviour); noise, above and below water | High (3); High (3) | High (3) |
| Loch of Stenness | Lagoon (Favourable maintained 2005) | Penetration and/or disturbance of the substrate below the surface of the seabed, including abrasion; abrasion/disturbance of the substrate on the surface of the seabed; changes in suspended solids, water clarity; smothering and siltation rate changes; de-oxygenation; nutrient enrichment/organic enrichment; introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species (INIS) | High (3) for each pressure | High (3) |
| Sanday Reefs | Reefs (Favourable maintained, 2011) | Penetration and/or disturbance of the substrate below the surface of the seabed, including abrasion; abrasion/disturbance of the substrate on the surface of the seabed; changes in suspended solids, water clarity; smothering and siltation rate changes; deoxygenation; nutrient enrichment/organic enrichment; introduction or spread of INIS | High (3) | High (3) |
| Sanday Reefs | Subtidal sandbanks (Favourable maintained, 2011) | Abrasion/disturbance of the substrate on the surface of the seabed; smothering and siltation rate changes; de-oxygenation; nutrient enrichment/organic enrichment; introduction or spread of INIS | High (3), except nutrient enrichment/organic enrichment: Medium (2) | High (3) |
| Sanday Reefs | Intertidal mudflats and sandflats (Favourable maintained, 2011) | No pressure/interaction – screened out | N/A | — |
| Sanday Reefs | Harbour seal (Unfavourable declining, 2024) | Visual disturbance (behaviour); noise, above and below water | High (3); High (3) | — |
Appendix 3: Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas assessment
A3.1
An individual site sensitivity value has been attributed to the Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (NC MPA) within the Orkney Islands marine region that have protected features with identified pressure/interaction with finfish farming development and/or activities.
A3.2
The sensitivity value for each NC MPA has been attributed on the basis of the sensitivity of the site’s protected feature(s) to finfish farming development and/or activities.
A3.3
The assessment of the relevant finfish farm consent applications will take into account, through the relevant process, any impacts or effects on receptors located outwith the Orkney Islands marine region.
A3.4
The sensitivity value for each NC MPA has been attributed by following steps 1 to 4:
- Identify the protected features for each NC MPA (see Table A4: Column B).
- Identify the pressures from finfish farming development and/or activities on each NC MPA protected feature using Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool (FeAST) assessments (see Table A4: Column C).
- Identify the sensitivity of these qualifying features to each pressure using values of low (1), medium (2) or high (3) (see Table A4: Column D).
- Assign the individual NC MPA sensitivity value based on the most sensitive qualifying feature within the NC MPA designation (see Table A4: Column E).
Table A4: Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas Summary
| Nature Conservation MPA | Qualifying feature | Pressures/interactions: finfish farming | FeAST feature sensitivity | Sensitivity value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wyre and Rousay Sounds | Kelp and seaweed communities on sublittoral sediment | Introduction or spread of non-indigenous species and translocations (competition); removal of non-target species (lethal) | Medium (2); Medium (2) | High (3) |
| Wyre and Rousay Sounds | Maerl beds | De-oxygenation; introduction or spread of non-indigenous species and translocations (competition); nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; synthetic compound contamination, including pesticides, antifoulants and pharmaceuticals; siltation rate changes (heavy) | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Wyre and Rousay Sounds | Marine Geomorphology of the Scottish Shelf Seabed | No pressure/interaction – screened out | None | — |
| Papa Westray | Black guillemot, foraging range 4.9 km | Barrier to mobile species movement; death or injury by collision below water; death or injury by collision above water; removal of non-target species (lethal); visual disturbance (behaviour) | Medium (2) | Medium (2) |
| Papa Westray | Marine Geomorphology of the Scottish Shelf Seabed | No pressures/interactions | None | — |
| North-west Orkney | Sandeels | Organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; siltation rate changes (heavy) | Medium (2), High (3), Medium (2), Medium (2), High (3) | High (3) |
| North-west Orkney | Marine Geomorphology of the Scottish Shelf Seabed | No pressure/interaction – screened out | None | — |
Appendix 4: Priority Marine Features assessment
A4.1
The Geodatabase of Marine Features Adjacent to Scotland (GeMS) PMF records within the Orkney Islands marine region are identified in Map 2. There are PMF locations that have not yet been recorded and are therefore not identified in the spatial data used within this Guidance. PMF records will be periodically updated within this Guidance as detailed in Appendix 5 to incorporate any updated records.
A4.3
PMFs are a subset of species and habitats identified on national, UK or international lists. Therefore, all PMFs are of at least national conservation significance in Scotland, but may be of UK level or international significance. Each PMF recorded in the Orkney Islands marine region has been attributed a significance value on the basis of national or international conservation status. Refer to Table A5 for the conservation status and significance value attributed to relevant PMF.
A4.4
An individual PMF sensitivity value has been attributed to PMFs within the Orkney Islands marine region that have identified pressure/interaction with finfish farming development and/or activities.
A4.5
The sensitivity value for each PMF has been attributed by following steps 1 to 5:
- Identify the PMFs present within Orkney’s marine region (Table A5, Column A).
- Advice was taken from NatureScot on which PMFs to include within the Spatial Guidance.
- Identify the pressures/interactions on the selected PMFs from finfish farming using Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool (FeAST) assessments (see Table A5: Column D).
- Identify the sensitivity of selected PMFs to each pressure using values of low (1), medium (2) or high (3) (Table A5, Column E).
- Assign the overall PMF sensitivity value based on the highest sensitivity of a FeAST-listed pressure/interaction (Table A5, Column F).
Table A5: Priority Marine Features Summary
| Priority Marine Feature (PMF) | PMF Conservation Status | Significance value | Pressures/interactions: finfish farming | FeAST feature sensitivity | Sensitivity value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maerl beds | International significance, Habitats Directive Appendix 1, and OSPAR threatened and/or declining habitats and species, Region III | 3 | De-oxygenation; introduction or spread of non-indigenous species and translocations (competition); nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; synthetic compound contamination, including pesticides, antifoulants and pharmaceuticals; siltation rate changes (heavy) | Medium (2) and High (3) | High (3) |
| Seagrass beds | International significance, Habitats Directive Appendix 1, and OSPAR threatened and/or declining habitats and species. All regions where they occur | 3 | Introduction or spread of non-indigenous species and translocations (competition); nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment; organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; siltation rate changes (heavy) | Medium (2), High (3) | High (3) |
| Flame shell beds | National significance; UK Biodiversity Action Plan priority habitat/species. Scotland is a particularly important location for this species in the international context | 2 | Organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; siltation rate changes (heavy) | High (3), except siltation rate changes (light): Medium (2) | High (3) |
| Horse mussel beds | International significance, Habitats Directive Appendix 1, and OSPAR threatened and/or declining habitats and species. All regions where they occur | 3 | Organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); siltation rate changes (light); surface abrasion; siltation rate changes (heavy) | Medium (2), High (3) | High (3) |
| Fan mussel aggregations | Low national significance, BAP priority habitat/species, and Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 5. Scotland is a particularly important location for this species in the international context | 2 | Physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species (lethal); surface abrasion; siltation rate changes (heavy) | High (3), Medium (2) | High (3) |
| Northern Feather Star | National significance, Nationally Important Marine Feature (NIMF) and PMF | 2 | Organic enrichment; physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species; siltation changes (low); siltation changes (high); surface abrasion | Medium; Medium; Medium; Medium; High; Medium | 3 |
| Ocean Quahog | International significance, OSPAR threatened and/or declining habitats and species, Region II | 3 | Physical change to another seabed type; removal of non-target species; siltation changes (high) | High; Medium; High | 3 |
*Attributed on the basis of most sensitive qualifying feature.
Appendix 5: Receptor location data updates
A5.1
It is important that receptor locations are identified using the most up to date data. The receptors identified in Table A6 may be reviewed and updated to ensure that the data are current and up to date. Table A6 identifies the data sources used for receptor locations and updates.
Table A6: Data sources
| Receptor | Data source |
|---|---|
| Special Protection Areas (SPA) | NatureScot SiteLink |
| Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) | NatureScot SiteLink |
| Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (NC MPA) | NatureScot SiteLink |
| Priority Marine Features (PMF) | NatureScot Geodatabase for Marine Habitats and Species adjacent to Scotland |
| Seal haul-out sites | Scottish Government (Marine Directorate) and Sea Mammal Research Unit |
| National Scenic Area (NSA) | NatureScot SiteLink |
| World Heritage Site and Inner Sensitivity Zone | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Scapa Flow Historic Marine Protected Area (HMPA) | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Scheduled Monuments | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Listed buildings | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Controlled Sites or Protected Places | Ministry of Defence |
| Conservation Areas | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes | Historic Environment Scotland |
| Indicative ferry routes | Orkney Islands Council |
| Shipping Density Areas | Marine Management Organisation |
| Widewall Bay Harbour of Refuge | Orkney Islands Council |
| Pier and harbour infrastructure locations, not the associated sensitive areas | Orkney Islands Council |
| Designated Anchor Berths (Scapa Flow) | OceanWise |
| Anchorages listed in the Clyde Cruising Club Sailing Directions and Anchorages Publication | Clyde Cruising Club Sailing Directions and Anchorages Publication |
| Visiting Yacht Moorings | Orkney Islands Council |
| Other established anchorages | OceanWise and Clyde Cruising Club |
| Submarine electricity cables | OceanWise |
| Submarine telecommunication cables | OceanWise |
| Out of Service (OoS) subsea cables | OceanWise |
| Hydrocarbon pipelines | OceanWise |
| Subsea water pipelines | OceanWise |
| Wave and tidal energy sites – Crown Estate Scotland lease and agreement for lease areas | Crown Estate Scotland |
| The Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy – Plan Options | Crown Estate Scotland |
| Active aquaculture sites | Scottish Government (Marine Directorate) |
This publication is available at www.orkney.gov.uk.
Published by Orkney Islands Council.